This is ridiculous. Ronald Reagan is not smiling from heaven (or hell, wherever he is), because he did not launch reckless attacks on Siberia. This was not a Ukrainian attack. We need to call it what it was. It was a US attack ordered by Donald Trump, planned and executed by US personnel in the Ukraine. I think a Russian counterstrike of some description is more than justified - but Trump knows he has a coward in the Kremlin who will sit there and do nothing.
LOL, three people unsubscribed (so far), which is one more than the usual average of two per post - people I've never heard of, not long term, I guess the notion of Russia losing - or continuing to lose, lose, lose, upsets them. And if anyone destroys Russia, it will be Putin and his siloviki and Gerasimov and Shoigu - they've managed to kill or maim nearly a million of their citizens/subjects for little or nothing. The next mobilization that Russia does, they may as well shoot the people who get sucked in on the spot, and save the expense of transporting them to Ukraine, to the meatgrinder, and back. It's a government run by delusional psychopathic f*ckups, a real pathocracy.
I'm thinking of putting some language on the subscribe part to the effect of this: "Read through my posts before you subscribe, I have certain viewpoints on certain issues that may piss you off, so you might want to have a look around before you subscribe...". Or I could do the now usual thing of asking $5 per month for new subs, on the theory that people would have a closer look at what they're getting into - all of the "don't let the door hit you in the ass as you're leaving" types have been free subscribers. What people get here is what I think about things, according to my knowledge and principles - I don't pander to readers. Actually, people who *do* pander to their readers and don't act - and write - in accordance with some sort of guiding principles, are pretty worthless, so far as I'm concerned.
This is ridiculous. Ronald Reagan is not smiling from heaven (or hell, wherever he is), because he did not launch reckless attacks on Siberia. This was not a Ukrainian attack. We need to call it what it was. It was a US attack ordered by Donald Trump, planned and executed by US personnel in the Ukraine. I think a Russian counterstrike of some description is more than justified - but Trump knows he has a coward in the Kremlin who will sit there and do nothing.
LOL, three people unsubscribed (so far), which is one more than the usual average of two per post - people I've never heard of, not long term, I guess the notion of Russia losing - or continuing to lose, lose, lose, upsets them. And if anyone destroys Russia, it will be Putin and his siloviki and Gerasimov and Shoigu - they've managed to kill or maim nearly a million of their citizens/subjects for little or nothing. The next mobilization that Russia does, they may as well shoot the people who get sucked in on the spot, and save the expense of transporting them to Ukraine, to the meatgrinder, and back. It's a government run by delusional psychopathic f*ckups, a real pathocracy.
I'm thinking of putting some language on the subscribe part to the effect of this: "Read through my posts before you subscribe, I have certain viewpoints on certain issues that may piss you off, so you might want to have a look around before you subscribe...". Or I could do the now usual thing of asking $5 per month for new subs, on the theory that people would have a closer look at what they're getting into - all of the "don't let the door hit you in the ass as you're leaving" types have been free subscribers. What people get here is what I think about things, according to my knowledge and principles - I don't pander to readers. Actually, people who *do* pander to their readers and don't act - and write - in accordance with some sort of guiding principles, are pretty worthless, so far as I'm concerned.