They're actually vaccinations against "excess population" and population growth. The people behind this have an agenda which has nothing to do with public health.
Not sure masks actually do anything, a friend here was too fanatical about them and he's sick right now. He was wearing something like very tight N95 in his office and got infected by an employee. Mutations much?
It's not really "far right" that is the issue right now, if anything Bolsonaro has been holding up well. It's the far left that's become fascist together with all the puppets created by the WEF no matter which party. Fascism is far left regardless, remember what NSDAP means? Leftists have gone ape over removing rights and freedoms from people as they usually do when unleashed by their real masters.
Fossil fuels are not really fossil, there's research that proves cyanobacteriae in the ocean can (and do) generate hydrocarbons, also petrol is really generated inside the Earth's depths as proven by Russian scientists in Sweden. They created some petrol simulating high-pressure geophysical reactions in their lab too. There is proof petrol regenerates in old wells too. Just not in huge quantities. The real issue is unoptimised consumption. Everything is being done to waste oil as much as possible: Reusable plastics, fast trains instead of regular slower ones, more planes, planned obsolescence, etc. Global capitalism is an economy of burning resources as fast as possible for as much profit as possible.
It all looks like the goal is just to remove the "useless little people" from Earth while keeping them as distracted as possible. Otherwise scientific research/implementation would be aimed towards replacement of reusable plastics and generation of hydrocarbon fuels and their economic use, rather than plain extraction and wasteful manufacture.
I have wrestled with the idea of the vaccine being a tool to thin the population. If you wanted to get rid of 2/3 of the population, why get rid of the Sheep who did what they were told and rolled up their sleeves, and leave behind the Wolves who think for themselves? Wouldn’t you design something to kill the wolves & keep the more easily controlled sheep?
The people behind this have strong ties to eugenics organizations - here's part of a post I'm working on but haven't finished - "Arguably most troubling of all is the direct link of the vaccine’s lead developers to the Wellcome Trust and, in the case of Adrian Hill, the Galton Institute, two groups with longstanding ties to the UK eugenics movement. The latter organization, named for the “father of eugenics” Francis Galton, is the renamed UK Eugenics Society, a group notorious for over a century for its promotion of racist pseudoscience and efforts to “improve racial stock” by reducing the population of those deemed inferior. The ties of Adrian Hill to the Galton Institute should raise obvious concerns given the push to make the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine he developed with Gilbert the vaccine of choice for the developing world, particularly countries in Latin America, South and Southeast Asia, and Africa, the very areas where the Galton Institute’s past members have called for reducing population growth.” https://unlimitedhangout.com/2020/12/investigative-series/developers-of-oxford-astrazeneca-vaccine-tied-to-uk-eugenics-movement/
In order to "improve genetic stock", you'd want to get rid of those who didn't employ critical thinking, the estimated 80% of any workforce who "tag along", and select for the 20% who figure out how to get things done - that's my guess. It's increasing average IQ by cutting off the part with lower than average IQ, which would be the sort of thing eugenicists would go for, the reverse of "Idiocracy". Being entirely crass about it, they'd be looking to cull out people who could be herded, form them into a herd - the "mass formation" - and stampede them through the chutes where they get their shot(s), which will end up with their premature deaths - some short-term, some medium and long term - and sterilize their children. That's putting it pretty brutally, but eugenicists aren't exactly the kindest people around.
I think this may be just a *bit* too long - and there's more to it than just this... so cut this in two...
Not sure masks actually do anything, a friend here was too fanatical about them and he's sick right now. He was wearing something like very tight N95 in his office and got infected by an employee. Mutations much?
It's not really "far right" that is the issue right now, if anything Bolsonaro has been holding up well. It's the far left that's become fascist together with all the puppets created by the WEF no matter which party. Fascism is far left regardless, remember what NSDAP means? Leftists have gone ape over removing rights and freedoms from people as they usually do when unleashed by their real masters.
Fossil fuels are not really fossil, there's research that proves cyanobacteriae in the ocean can (and do) generate hydrocarbons, also petrol is really generated inside the Earth's depths as proven by Russian scientists in Sweden. They created some petrol simulating high-pressure geophysical reactions in their lab too. There is proof petrol regenerates in old wells too. Just not in huge quantities. The real issue is unoptimised consumption. Everything is being done to waste oil as much as possible: Reusable plastics, fast trains instead of regular slower ones, more planes, planned obsolescence, etc. Global capitalism is an economy of burning resources as fast as possible for as much profit as possible.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/09/090910084259.htm — that bit on Russian scientists in Sweden and non-fossil nature of oil.
It all looks like the goal is just to remove the "useless little people" from Earth while keeping them as distracted as possible. Otherwise scientific research/implementation would be aimed towards replacement of reusable plastics and generation of hydrocarbon fuels and their economic use, rather than plain extraction and wasteful manufacture.
I have wrestled with the idea of the vaccine being a tool to thin the population. If you wanted to get rid of 2/3 of the population, why get rid of the Sheep who did what they were told and rolled up their sleeves, and leave behind the Wolves who think for themselves? Wouldn’t you design something to kill the wolves & keep the more easily controlled sheep?
The people behind this have strong ties to eugenics organizations - here's part of a post I'm working on but haven't finished - "Arguably most troubling of all is the direct link of the vaccine’s lead developers to the Wellcome Trust and, in the case of Adrian Hill, the Galton Institute, two groups with longstanding ties to the UK eugenics movement. The latter organization, named for the “father of eugenics” Francis Galton, is the renamed UK Eugenics Society, a group notorious for over a century for its promotion of racist pseudoscience and efforts to “improve racial stock” by reducing the population of those deemed inferior. The ties of Adrian Hill to the Galton Institute should raise obvious concerns given the push to make the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine he developed with Gilbert the vaccine of choice for the developing world, particularly countries in Latin America, South and Southeast Asia, and Africa, the very areas where the Galton Institute’s past members have called for reducing population growth.” https://unlimitedhangout.com/2020/12/investigative-series/developers-of-oxford-astrazeneca-vaccine-tied-to-uk-eugenics-movement/
In order to "improve genetic stock", you'd want to get rid of those who didn't employ critical thinking, the estimated 80% of any workforce who "tag along", and select for the 20% who figure out how to get things done - that's my guess. It's increasing average IQ by cutting off the part with lower than average IQ, which would be the sort of thing eugenicists would go for, the reverse of "Idiocracy". Being entirely crass about it, they'd be looking to cull out people who could be herded, form them into a herd - the "mass formation" - and stampede them through the chutes where they get their shot(s), which will end up with their premature deaths - some short-term, some medium and long term - and sterilize their children. That's putting it pretty brutally, but eugenicists aren't exactly the kindest people around.