The "Vaccines" And "Boosters" Are Designed Very Well - To Ensure People Get Sick And Die Prematurely
The various shots fail to stop infection or stop spread, and their effects, by creating huge amounts of cytotoxic spike protein, are to kill off people or sterilize them at an early age...
The “vaccines” and “boosters” all get the body to produce huge amounts of spike proteins, and this production goes on for at least four months. This particular spike protein produces antibodies to the long extinct wild type of spike protein, see https://nextstrain.org/ncov/gisaid/global/6m. And this spike protein spreads throughout the body and has very well known cytotoxic effects - it kills cells which have ACE-2 receptors, hence myocarditis, neurological symptoms, and sterilization as seen in stillbirths and drop in fertility.
The current strain is far enough away from the original wild type so that antibodies to the wild type have no effect on it, so it’s impossible for them to stop infection - and the T-cells produced will only recognize the wild type and close relatives. And if the shots don’t stop infection, they won’t prevent spread, either. And they have another effect, too - they strongly prejudice the immune system to recognize the original wild type, which means that other farther away variants go unrecognized - the immune systems of the “vaccinated” and “boosted” populations are crippled, leaving those people wide open to infections, they’ve effectively got acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. And so they go in for more “boosters” whose sole effect is to maintain a high blood titer of the wild type spike protein, further crippling their immune systems.
”this is all leading to some strong conclusions.
omicron is much milder than prior strains, more so even than appears in the data. intrinsic CFR is likely down about a full log. (90%)
but omi is spreading like wildfire because it’s optimized to infect the vaccinated. their antigenic fixation has frozen their immune response and it’s clear that variant based boosters are not going to help. fixated is fixated.
and this is getting worse over time likely due to continuing selective pressure in an immune fixated herd. (how bad it can get is anyone’s guess. i’m not sure we even have a valid past model for this process)
prevalence is swamping declines in virulence and this is starting to show up in hospitalization data. whether that’s scary or incidental is not yet clear.
whether it makes it into deaths eventually is hard to predict with any confidence. it would likely take a huge jump in infectivity to counteract the drop in CFR, but when we start talking about 10X jumps in prevalence, this becomes possible, at least mathematically. (whether and to what extent that 10-11X is amplified by seasonal shift remains to be seen)
bottom line:
it is the vaccines driving covid evolution and superspread and they are failing faster by the day.
the reported cases data is masking this, but the magnitude of what’s starting to happen will be too big to hide from the general public much longer.
when you’re quad vaxxed and on your fifth round of covid and it feels worse than your fourth, even the stalwart “trust the experts” crowd starts to notice…”
Of course, there will be calls for even more boosters, and about the time that the Omicron variant goes extinct, there will be a new, useless (at least for infection control) “booster”, which further cripples the immune system and which keeps those all-important spike protein blood titers up - with their now very predictable effects.
Now, from a comment I made this last January: “Klaus Schwab and a lot of his buddies are pretty closely tied in to the Club of Rome. and one of the main concerns of this club is population which has grown beyond "carrying capacity". If you look at "Limits to Growth", published in 1972, it predicts depletion of important non-renewable resources - mainly fossil fuels. Mechanized agriculture is entirely dependent on fossil fuels - as is pretty much everything else. But it's food production which is the bottleneck. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.apf.org/resource/collection/D414A95A-9CB5-46D5-A62E-565111D12CA9/2018-SE-APFCompassLimits-To-Growth.pdf
Capitalism is dependent on growth of capital, and this growth is exponential. The WEF people are really interested in economic growth - they really want to keep it going. Unfortunately, resources which fuel growth - fossil fuels, primarily - are finite and being depleted. Once used, they're gone. So exponential growth has a limit point. And population growth is directly correlated to growth in energy use, too.
And, to drive the point home, this:
So, to keep things going in the way the WEF people want, population growth would have had to be controlled - capped - by, say, 1980. That didn't happen, population has at least doubled since then. So, by this argument, and with this set of facts, population has to be reduced. And growth has to be capped. And the question is, how?
Global nuclear war would do the trick, but the people who run the WEF really don't want that - nor does any sane person - which at this point, includes very few people from the US/EU ruling class, or so it would seem - Ukraine, anyone? [note from June 2022 - Putin’s peculiar focus on targeting civilian populations and his theft of every bit of grain his forces can get from Ukraine, one of the world’s largest producers, 400,000 tons so far, and thus potentially manufacturing famine in many countries dependent on that grain - and which also tend to have very low “vaccination” levels…]
So there has to be another way to get this done. A drug which kills people, not outright for the most part, but over a period of about five years, and which sterilizes children before they reach reproductive age, that would do the trick. If you could get 80% of the world's population to voluntarily take this drug, within about 5 years, the problem would be a long way down the road to a solution. And you'd want to selectively kill off non-productive, non-creative populations - the "woke", the people with "bullshit jobs", the elderly - trimming deadweight, so to speak. Unfortunately, you can't really get people to voluntarily take such a drug or give it to their children, at least under normal circumstances.
So, you have to create abnormal circumstances - like a worldwide pandemic - and the drug is the "vaccine"... And that would work. And maybe it has.”
So these “vaccines” and “boosters” may prove to be very effective, just not in the way that people think.
"The exponential increase in use of Earth resources has led to a huge rise in the standard of living for some segments of the population, chiefly in the industrial world, and
the hope for a better standard of living by many others. But the rapid exploitation or
resources since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution coupled with continued population increase cannot continue. The globalization of commerce and trade by use of oil has led to the worldwide exploitation of mineral and energy resources by the industrialized and industrializing countries, in effect, “the tragedy of the commons” (Hardin, 1969) in its ultimate final form. The
decline of oil production will in turn result in the return of local economies forced to
exist on more locally available resources, as has been the circumstance during much of
human history. This will greatly remake our economies and lifestyles from what we know
today. This profoundly important fact is discussed again in its various aspects in subsequent chapters. With the huge population growth made possible by advances in medicine and sanitation, and greatly increased food production largely a benefit of fossil fuels, the finite
Earth resources are under unprecedented stress. In 1700, world population is estimated to
have been about 610 million. It is now seven billion and increasing every day. This huge
increase in population and the related increase in resource consumption are the salient
facts of the past three centuries.
Population growth is the force that drives resource consumption. As we view the
present and look towards the future, this is the overriding challenge to a sustainable and
acceptable future. Due to differences in living standards, some populations (in industrialized countries) use more resources per capita than other populations. In some places local
populations are so desperate to survive they destroy the environment with present use and
cannot preserve it to sustain future population. In general, population growth and the
environment are in direct conflict. In terms of resource use per capita, whether it is large
or small, more people use more resources, renewable and nonrenewable." https://thegreatstory.org/geodestinies-youngquist-2022.pdf
Some of the author's background - "I also express my gratitude to my former employers, who gave me the opportunity to study both domestic and international mineral resource economics and supplies. I was also able to view the social, political, and environmental influences of Earth resources as they relate to the world’s burgeoning population. These include the U.S. Geological Survey, my consulting clients, Sun Oil Company, Shell Oil Company, Amoco, Humble Oil Company (now part of ExxonMobil), the Minerals Department of Exxon Corporation, and my full-time employer in Peru, International Petroleum Company, Ltd., affiliate of what was then Standard Oil Company (N.J.), later to become ExxonMobil Corporation. Working for ExxonMobil in any of its divisions is an intense and continuing educational experience." Read his acknowledgements...
His book is well worth reading.
I can't believe that Paul Erlich is still around or that anybody listens to him. I can never forgive The Population Bomb.